Hope Hicks, formerly one of President Donald Trump‘s closest aides, repeatedly declined to answer questions on Wednesday in an interview with US congressional investigators, with lawyers at her side carefully orchestrating her responses.
White House lawyers asserted immunity for Hicks on matters involving her 14 months in the Trump administration, continuing the strategy of not cooperating with investigations by the Democratic-led House of Representatives.
Politicians wanted to ask the 30-year-old publicist about six instances in which Democrats believe Trump may have broken the law during the 2016 presidential campaign and while in the White House.
But Hicks’s responses were so limited that she would not even tell them where her White House office was, Democratic members of Congress told reporters.
Hicks was directed not to answer questions about material she already told Special Counsel Robert Mueller during his investigation of Russian election interference and possible obstruction by Trump, the politicians said.
“They make the objection, we say it’s nonsense. But Hope Hicks is listening to what they’re saying in terms of objections, so she doesn’t answer,” US Representative Ted Lieu said.
Lieu said Hicks did answer questions about the campaign but did not elaborate.
Democratic politicians said White House lawyers did not claim executive privilege but argued that Hicks was immune from having to testify, which they called a “bogus” position that does not exist in law.
“No prior president has engaged in such a transparent effort to block his own former aides from testifying about the president’s misconduct,” Judiciary Chairman Jerrold Nadler said in a letter to the White House counsel.
Hicks was Trump’s campaign press secretary and White House communications director until she left in March 2018 and later became chief communications officer and executive president for Fox Corporation, the parent company of Fox News.
Democrats who emerged from the session said they may go to court to force Hicks to respond.
“We have to establish the record of her refusal to answer the questions so that she can be compelled to do it. So, this is what we’re doing today,” Representative David Cicilline said.
“It’s not at all helpful. It’s more obstruction by the White House,” said US Representative Veronica Escobar, a Judiciary Democrat who said it was time to impeach Trump.
Democrats on the committee wanted to ask Hicks about alleged hush money payments made during the campaign to two women, including adult film star Stormy Daniels, who say they had affairs with Trump. He has denied having sexual encounters with Daniels.
They also wanted Hicks to talk about five examples of potential obstruction of justice by Trump that are laid out in the redacted version of Mueller’s report, as well as the president’s efforts to impede the Mueller investigation.
Democrats also wanted Hicks to testify about an effort by the president to mislead the public about a June 9, 2016, meeting at Trump Tower in New York, where the Mueller report said campaign officials, including the president’s son Donald Trump Jr, met Russians offering “dirt” on Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
Aides said Hicks also would be asked about alleged obstruction by Trump involving former White House Counsel Don McGahn, former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, former FBI Director James Comey and former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.
A transcript of her testimony will be featured at a Thursday hearing where the committee will examine an ABC News interview, in which Trump said he saw nothing wrong with accepting damaging information about a US political opponent from a foreign government, aides said.
Democrats say Hicks’s appearance could help undermine Trump’s strategy of stonewalling congressional investigators by encouraging others to cooperate with them.
It could also give them the chance to challenge in court any assertion of executive privilege – a legal principle sometimes cited by presidents to keep White House information under wraps.
Mueller’s 448-page report found insufficient evidence to establish that the Trump campaign engaged in a criminal conspiracy with Moscow, despite numerous contacts between the campaign and Russia.
It also described numerous attempts by Trump to impede Mueller’s investigation but stopped short of declaring that he committed a crime.
Hicks was mentioned 183 times in Mueller’s report.